Food court & plaza compliance.
One property-manager point of contact for every food-service tenant unit, instead of chasing each tenant's own vendor.
A food court or plaza with multiple food-service tenants creates a compliance problem the property manager usually inherits, whether or not it's in the lease: if one tenant's grease trap backs up or one unit fails an inspection, it's the property's fire and sewer risk, not just that tenant's.
Property-manager crossover.
We work the same way here as we do for multi-location property-management accounts: one contract, one schedule, one report covering every food-service unit in the plaza. Each tenant unit is measured against its own NFPA 96 frequency tier, based on what that specific kitchen actually cooks, and every unit's grease trap is tracked under the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 681 "25% rule" independently. The property manager gets one consolidated compliance view across the whole plaza instead of reconciling reports from however many tenant-hired vendors are currently in the building.
What property managers get.
Per-unit tenant reviews
Each tenant unit assessed and priced against its actual cooking volume, not a flat plaza-wide rate.
Consolidated plaza reporting
One compliance record covering every food-service unit, ready for a building-wide inspection.
Single point of contact
One account team coordinating every tenant's schedule, instead of the property manager doing it themselves.
This mirrors our multi-location property-management approach, applied unit by unit within one property. See the full Property Manager program →
Tell us how many tenant units you're managing.
Request a plaza-wide quoteSources
- NFPA 96: Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations — nfpa.org
- City of Toronto, Municipal Code Chapter 681 (Sewers By-law) — toronto.ca (PDF)